Most Active Stories
- Saratoga County Sheriff's Sgt. Resigns, Charged With Misconduct After Video Goes Viral
- Donation Of Historic Amusement Park May Be Brought To Referendum
- Maloney: de Blasio "Should Have Head Examined" After Withholding Clinton Endorsement
- Pittsfield's 3rd Thursdays Undergoes Changes For 2015 Season
- Western Massachusetts School Investigates Allegations Of Inappropriate Sexual Conduct
New England News
Wed September 5, 2012
Springfield Puts Temporary Hold On Casino Selection Work
The city of Springfield Massachusetts put its casino competition on hold Wednesday. The move came one day after the state’s top gambling industry regulators raised questions about the city’s casino selection process. WAMC’s Pioneer Valley Bureau Chief Paul Tuthill reports.
Springfield city officials will delay for at least a week putting out a public request for proposals from casino operators. City officials will attend a meeting of the Massachusetts Gaming Commission on September 11th in hopes of clearing up questions about the integrity and timetable of the process that has been announced for evaluating what could be as many as four competing proposals to build a resort casino valued at more than $500 million.
Springfield Mayor Domenic Sarno insists the delay is not significant.
The gambling commission urged Springfield officials to delay the start of the casino selection process. The mayor, last month, announced a two phase process for evaluating casino operators and site specific projects that is to culminate with a binding voter referendum. The mayor said, today, he still hopes to hold the referendum by April.
But the city’s aggressive timetable could see it settling on a casino project before the gaming commission determines if the operator qualifies for a license in Massachusetts. The other concern has to do with a potential conflict of interest involving the consultant the Sarno administration hired to help it evaluate the casino proposals.
The consultant , Shefsky and Froelich is registered in Illinois as a lobbyist for two of the casino operators competing in Springfield, MGM Resorts International and Penn National Gaming. Springfield’s city solicitor, Ed Pikula said all necessary steps are being taken to avoid any real conflicts of interest, and he’s confident the city will receive unbiased advice.
The State Ethics Commission has reportedly been asked for an opinion on whether there is a legal conflict of interest involving Springfield’s consultant. Mayor Sarno wrote a letter to the gaming commission last week seeking what he called “ guidance and clarification” on the hiring of the consultant.
Springfield City Council President James Ferrera said with the stakes so high, the city can’t afford missteps
Ferrera , who has appointed an ad-hoc committee to review casino proposals and make recommendations on land use issues to the full city council, said he may name a second panel to look into how the administration went about hiring the consultant.
New England News